Blog

Posts Tagged ‘domain’

Information about New Top-Level Domains

Posted by ipelton on: January 27th, 2012

I had the pleasure of speaking recently to an audience of “cyberspace” attorneys from around the world for the American Bar Association’s Cyberspace Law Committee Winter Working Group meeting in San Francisco.

Much thanks to Kristine Dorrain, Director of Internet and IP Services at the National Arbitration Forum, who spoke with me and who has forgetten more about domain names than I will ever know!

Our presentation provided information about the impending release of new top level domain names and was called “The New Top-Level Domains: Guidance for the Business Lawyer.

To view the PowerPoint of the presentation, including links to a lot of valuable information on the new domain name procedures and protections for brand owners, see link below:

 The New Top-Level Domains: Guidance for the Business Lawyer (PDF)

 

.XXX domain name redux

Posted by ipelton on: December 15th, 2011

The availability of .XXX domain names went public last week.  Many companies registered or blocked the .XXX domains that correspond with their brands.  I think this was a wise choice even though it was arguably a form a extortion by the domain registries.  The cost was a few hundred dollars. The risk of not owning or blocking it was unknown – who would buy it? what would they try to do with it? how much might it cost to shut them down? how would someone else using/owning the domain name affect search engine results? could a brand.xxx website – even if live only for a few days – cause damage to a reputable, protected, and valuable brand?

As I said before, the risks were too large in my opinion to let the .XXX domains go unblocked.  According to one report, Google will treat .XXX domains just like any others (via AVN.com) - to me that means a greater risk of potential damage (if Google decided to block them or treat them differently, the potential harm might be minimized) According to a report, in the first 24 hours of general availability there were more than 55,000 new .XXX domain name registrations created.

But  some companies chose not to register the .XXX domains corresponding with their brands. According to an article on msnbc.com, HuffingtonPost.xxx and NBCNews.xxx.  But according to Domain Incite, this information may be inaccurate as the .XXX registrar – ICM Registry – may have on its own taken control of some domains that it believe were infringing trademarks. This could open a new can of worms as many brand owners paid the fees to block domains corresponding to their registered domains. If the Domain Incite information is true, some brand owners received the same result without any cost.  How did ICM decide which brands deserved the pro-active protection without the request of the trademark holder? The same issue may have already arisen in relation to .XXX domains corresponding to celebrity names – some were apparently automatically protected, others were not.

 Where does this leave us? I’m not sure. Some clarification from ICM Registry would be great. Absent such clarification I still believe that brand owners are better off registering the domain names rather than worry about the potentially difficult, damaging and/or costly answers to questions such as:

- who would buy it?

- what would they try to do with it?

- how much might it cost to shut them down and .XXX site?

- how would someone else using/owning the domain name affect search engine results?

- could a brand.xxx website – even if live only for a few days – cause damage to a reputable, protected, and valuable brand?

Reasonable people may disagree. I would love to hear what other brand owners have decided to due and what other guidance trademark attorneys have provided to their clients on this subject.

image from icmregistry.com

 

Top Trademark Trends of 2011

Posted by ipelton on: December 14th, 2011

2011 was a busy year for brand owners and those following the field of trademarks as trademark filings in the US increased and continued growth of the internet, social media platforms, and mobile applications impacts brand owners. Some of the biggest news stories of the year – from the passing of Steve Jobs to the “Occupy Wall Street” movement – also had trademark significance.

Celebrity trademarks continue to grow. Numerous celebrities made news in 2011 with their trademarks: ‘The Situation’ and Abercrombie are contesting the apparel company’s use of “The Fitchuation” and other parodies; Charlie Sheen filed numerous trademark applications after his well publicized blow up with CBS; and the Kardashian trademark empire continues to grow with the filing of more than 40 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) trademark applications. 

Political trademarks. Sarah and Bristol Palin made headlines for receiving registered trademarks in 2011 covering their names in connection with motivational speaking services. President Obama’s re-election campaign filed to protect its logos and also recently sued a merchandise maker for infringement. The death of Osama Bin Laden was followed by Disney trademark applications for SEAL TEAM 6; they were abandoned days later after the ensuing public relations backlash. In the last part of 2011, more than 20 “Occupy Wall Street” related applications were filed.

Steve Jobs. The October death of Apple Inc. founder and CEO Steve Jobs inspired many retrospectives about how he changed our culture over the 30 years by teaching us to THINK DIFFERENT®. Along the way, Jobs helped make several Apple brand names and logos among the most recognized and most valuable in the world: iPhone®, iPad®, Mac®, and many others. Many Apple product designs are also registered trademarks.

Mark Image    

.XXX domain names. In September, the ‘sunrise’ or pre-registration period began for the new .xxx top level domain name extension. Owners of registered trademarks and operators of adult websites were given the opportunity to secure .xxx domains before the full public release on December 6th.

New gTLDs. ICANN announced the long discussed launch of new generic top-level domain names (gTLDs) in 2011 with an application process commencing in 2012. Reaction ranged from excitement from some brand owners to serious concerns by many others as the procedures for protecting and blocking “.brand” domain names are convoluted, expensive, and not guaranteed to provide quick and affordable resolutions. As 2012 begins, look for last minute challenges to the ICANN plans.

Trademark filings increase. Through the end of November 2011, USPTO trademark application filings increased 6.5% over the same period last year. The increase may be a positive indicator for the economy’s growth as filing levels are approaching a return to the record high of 2008. At the close of FY2011, the USPTO register of trademarks contained 1,719,247 trademarks, an increase of 24.6 percent in just four years! 

Trademark bullies study released. In April, the Department of Commerce released the “Trademark Litigation Tactics and Federal Government Services to Protect Trademarks and Prevent Counterfeiting” study, which was mandated by Congress to assess the extent of trademark “bullying.” The study fell short of making sweeping recommendations or identifying any significant perceived problems and suggested (1) private sector pro bono efforts, (2) additional legal education programs for attorneys, and (3) enhancing outreach from government agencies. The study largely fell on deaf ears as Congress held no hearings and issued no reaction.

USPTO outreach. The USPTO continued growing dialogue and collaboration with its trademark users and applicants as it hosted several roundtables and the National Trademark Expo, and requested comments from the public on several proposed changes to its practices. USPTO online trademark systems continued to move into the future in 2011 with enhancements to the online trademark filing system and the availability of trademark records via the cloud.

Popular trademark words in 2011. Here are some of the most popular terms appearing in USPTO trademark applications filed in 2011 (through December 1st):

    • SOCIAL            753    
    • NETWORK  1,000
    • CLOUD             827
    • GREEN         1,607
    • MOBILE          708
    • BOOK               606

Louboutin’s red soles put to the test. In 2008, designer Christian Louboutin registered a mark consisting of red sole in connection with “women’s high fashion designer footwear.” Earlier this year the designer sued Yves Saint Laurent for infringement based on YSL’s all red shoes which included a red sole. The court not only failed to side with Louboutin, it indicated that the registration could not be enforced and might be cancelled. The case has since been appealed to the Second Circuit and will be watched by many fashion brands.

What to look for in 2012. Expect even more trademark disputes between brand owners related to social media and mobile applications as their use continues to grow. Louboutin’s appeal will be closely watched as the lines between fashion, aesthetics, and brands continue to blur. The biggest trademark story of 2012 will likely be the launch of the new top level domains and the challenges and opportunities they will present to brand owners.

About Erik M. Pelton: Erik Pelton is the founder of Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC, a boutique trademark law firm in Falls Church, Virginia. Established in 1999, the firm has registered more than 1,500 U.S. trademarks for clients and represented dozens of parties in trademark disputes. In 2011, Erik presented on trademark and social media issues to a variety of audiences, including the Harrisburg University Social Media Summit, Business of Software, and American Bar Association.

© 2011 Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Related Story:

Today, the .XXX domain registry is available to the pubic. Some businesses have decided in advance to buy or block .XXX domain extensions that match their websites or brand names. I did too.  Here is what a blocked .xxx domain name looks like after I filed a sunrise application for tm4smallbiz.xxx based on the USPTO registration of TM4SMALLBIZ:

As I noted previously:

I strongly urge brand owners to consider the potential value of the pre-registration of the .XXX domains corresponding to their brand(s). Brand tarnishment, trademark infringement or cybersquatting issues could be far more expensive to manage than the domain registration costs. Not to mention the burdens and blemishes that could be created if someone registers and uses a .XXX version of your website or brand and appears high in the search engine rankings.

Since I practice what I preach, I have submitted a sunrise claim for tm4smallbiz.xxx. I have also submitted an order to register erikpelton.xxx as soon as it becomes available. I certainly don’t intend to use these domain names – I just want to be sure that no one else uses them in an unsavory manner, which could force me to spend  far more money to deal with the situation and cause  me to worry about my brand’s image.

Of course, it is possible that the .XXX domain name fizzles out and will be no big deal. After all, there are plenty of adult websites existing with .com and other domain extensions. Besides, did anyone ever use the .NAME and.PRO top level domains after they launched?

For more information about .XXX, see http://www.icmregistry.com/about/

.XXX domain registration begins

Posted by ipelton on: September 16th, 2011

On September 8, the ‘sunrise’ period for a new top level domain (TLD) began, and brand owners worldwide are taking note. The .XXX top level domain will go live in the next few months; the ‘sunrise’ period allows certain brand owners to pre-register certain .XXX domain names to essentially block anyone else from gaining ownership of them . As you can imagine, the .XXX domain name is targeted at adult industries.

Who is eligible to pre-register? Owners of adult website domains and trademarks, as well as owners of registered trademarks in any industry who wish to block names from use in .XXX.

In order to submit a pre-registration claim during the sunrise period, an application and payment must be submitted to a qualified registrar no later than October 28, 2011.

Beginning December 6th (after an auction of premium .XXX domains), the unsecured adult domain names will be available to the general public.

I strongly urge brand owners to consider the potential value of the pre-registration of the .XXX domains corresponding to their brand(s). Brand tarnishment, trademark infringement or cybersquatting issues could be far more expensive to manage than the domain registration costs. Not to mention the burdens and blemishes that could be created if someone registers and uses a .XXX version of your website or brand and appears high in the search engine rankings.

Since I practice what I preach, I have submitted a sunrise claim for tm4smallbiz.xxx. I have also submitted an order to register erikpelton.xxx as soon as it becomes available. I certainly don’t intend to use these domain names – I just want to be sure that no one else uses them in an unsavory manner, which could force me to spend  far more money to deal with the situation and cause  me to worry about my brand’s image.

Of course, it is possible that the .XXX domain name fizzles out and will be no big deal. After all, there are plenty of adult websites existing with .com and other domain extensions. Besides, did anyone ever use the .NAME and .PRO top level domains after they launched?

For more information about .XXX, see http://www.icmregistry.com/about/