Blog

Posts Tagged ‘tmscams’

Last week, New York intellectual property law firm Leason Ellis LLP filed suit against Patent & Trademark Agency, LLC in Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging that the company’s solicitations to trademark owners are scams and constitute unauthorized practice of law. Several causes of action are alleged in the complaint, including unfair competition, false advertising, and tortious interference with prospective economic relations.

The complaint references the USPTO’s warning regarding such scams as well as my blog post about the same company: Beware of new trademark scam from Patent & Trademark Agency LLC. See paragraph 50 on page 9 of the complaint below.

Last year, Leason Ellis sued USA Trademark Enterprises, Inc. over similar practices seeking to take advantage of trademark owners and as part of a consent agreement it appears that the company is now out of business as the defendants in that case are now barred from engaging in intellectual property-related activities in the US. Stay tuned to see what happens with the claims against Patent & Trademark Agency, LLC.

Leason Ellis LLP v. Patent & Trademark Agency, LLC (complaint)

Trademark solicitations that are misleading and/or rip-offs continue to be rampant. But more warnings from the USPTO and from practitioners, along with more efforts like this one from Leason Ellis LLP to shut down the offenders, will hopefully limit their reach and eventually lead to their  disappearance. For more information about Leason Ellis LLP, click the logo below:

The top trademark trends in 2012 continued several themes from recent years including celebrity brand names and domain name developments. Other big news stories, like the election, also affected the trademark world. Here is a summary of the year’s major trademark related developments:

Celebrity trademarks – and problems – continue to increase. What do Tim Tebow, Jeremy Lin, Psy, and the Kardashians have in common? All made news with trademark issues in 2012. On the field, Tebow led a playoff run and was traded to the New York Jets; off the field he registered the word TEBOWING for use with shirts and hats. The Kardashians own many trademarks but they found themselves defending infringement allegations on their Kardashian Khroma name and Kardashian Kollection logo. Blue Ivy Carter, born to Beyonce and Jay-Z in January, instantly made trademark news as her parents filed to register her name as a trademark with the USPTO just days after the birth. The video for “Gangnam Style” by Psy was viewed more than one billion times, and both the singer and song name are the subjects of pending trademark applications with the USPTO. As even more sports and entertainment stars become marketing powers, these celebrity trademark trends are bound to continue.

Disney acquires Star Wars. In October, Disney announced a $4 billion purchase of Lucasfilm, makers of the Star Wars movies and franchise. Disney already owned more than one thousand registered trademarks, but the Star Wars® marks will become some of its most valuable properties. Dozens of Star Wars trademarks are registered, including DROID®, the sound of a light saber, and the configuration of Darth Vader’s costume.

Scams. Service providers sending dubious solicitations to trademark owners received attention from trademark attorneys, the USPTO, and courts. The USPTO issued several warnings to its users and took the unprecedented step of sending a cease and desist letter to “United States Trademark Registration Office,” whose solicitations particularly mimicked government correspondence. As the USPTO’s trademark data becomes more accessible online, scams and overpriced offers continue to reach unsuspecting trademark owners. Perhaps additional efforts from the USPTO, the FTC or law enforcement agencies in 2013 will help curtail their growth.

Updated logos. Many brands refreshed their logo designs in 2012, including Microsoft, JC Penney, Cisco, State Farm, Kraft, Domino’s, ebay, the Brooklyn Nets, and Best Buy. As brands continue to increase become more online, social, and mobile, and as big brands look to expand into new product and service markets, I predict that many more will reinvent their logos in the next few years.

                                     

gTLDs. Last year continued the long slow march toward new ‘dot anything’ top level domains. The first phase – expensive applications to register .nfl, .shop, .google, .bank and the like – has been completed, and it is likely that the next objection phases and pre-registrations available to trademark owners will begin in 2013. Brand owners concerned about use of their trademarks in such top level domain names – or even in second level ones such as nike.shop – must continue to monitor the ICANN process.

Louboutin’s red sole trademark gets restricted. The most watched trademark case of 2012 was an appellate court decision from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in the matter of Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc. Louboutin, which makes expensive women’s high heel shoes recognized by their red lacquered sole, had sued YSL for trademark infringement after YSL made a monochrome shoe that was all red, including the sole. The Circuit Court found that Louboutin’s trademark rights, though registered with the USPTO, extend only to shoes where the red sole contrasts with the remainder of the shoe. Thus,  Louboutin’s claims against YSL were struck down, and the Court further directed the USPTO to amend Louboutin’s registration and limit its scope to shoes featuring such a contrast.

President Obama, re-elected in November, has a brand that is among the most well known for any politician in recent memory. The Obama campaign filed to register several of its trademarks in 2012, including the slogan GREATER TOGETHER and the logo below.

 What to look for in 2013.As the economy continues to grow slowly, it is likely that the number of new trademark applications will grow as well. Expect even more trademark issues involving celebrity brands in the news and continuing concerns – and delays – with the launch of new top level domains.

 

About Erik M. Pelton: Erik Pelton has been making trademarks bloom since 1999® as the founder of Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC, a boutique trademark law firm in Falls Church, Virginia. The firm has registered more than 1,700 U.S. trademarks for clients and has represented dozens of parties in trademark disputes. In 2012, Erik presented on trademark and social media issues to a variety of audiences, including Howard University, the Association of Intellectual Property Firms, the New York State Bar Association, and the National Veteran Small Business Conference.

subscribe to Tuesday Trademark TipSM

a short weekly email featuring key brand & trademark protection tips

© 2013 Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC. All Rights Reserved.

Even trademark attorneys receive scam domain name notices

Posted by ipelton on: October 30th, 2012

This week, I received the email below. I’m willing to bet that the facts claimed are not true and that the services they claim to offer are unnecessary.

Dear President,

We are the department of Asian Domain Registration Service in China. Here I have something to confirm with you. We formally received an application on Oct 17, 2012 that a company claimed Eluid investment Co. Ltd were applying to register “erikpelton” as their Net Brand and some domain names through our firm.

Now we are handling this registration, and after our initial checking, we found the name were similar to your company’s, so we need to check with you whether your company has authorized that company to register these names. If you authorized this, we would finish the registration at once. If you did not authorize, please let us know within 7 workdays, so that we could handle this issue better. After the deadline we will unconditionally finish the registration for Eluid investment Co. Ltd.Looking forward to your prompt reply.

Best Regards,

Tom Yan    

Tel: +0086-28-8591-5586 || Fax: +0086-28-8591-2116

9/F Libao building No,62 Kehua North Road,Wuhou District,Chengdu City,China

A quick search for the information provided in the email reveals that many other have reported on this same hoax (the wording, of course, changes slightly from time to time).

If you ever have doubts about such a solicitation, (a) search only for the information using a sentence from the questionable email, and (2) contact an attorney.

USPTO warns about 13 trademark scam operations

Posted by ipelton on: October 24th, 2012

In recent months, the USPTO has stepped up it’s efforts to educate trademark applicant and registrants about solicitations that target trademark owners and provide specious or grossly overpriced services and/or are meant to deceive the recipient into thinking they come from a government agency.

The PTO first cracked down on the U.S. Trademark Registration Office, sending it a cease and desist letter and demanding it change the name and stop mimicking government correspondence.

Now, the USPTO has published a WARNING: Non-USPTO Solicitations That May Resemble Official USPTO  featuring a list of more than 10 solicitations, with links to samples, for which it has recently received complaints.

The offending list (via USPTO.gov – click links for sample solicitations):

The USPTO’s efforts on this matter are greatly appreciated! Until these scams are out of business, people will continue to be their victims.

Despite my many warning to clients in communications to them and on this blog, these solicitations continue (and must be successful to justify their continued operations and postage).

If you have been a victim of any of these scams, I urge you to contact the FTC and your local attorney general to complain.

 USPTO

Via a recent FOIA request, I was able to obtain copies of the correspondence between the USPTO’s Office of the Solicitor and the outfit that was known as U.S. Trademark Registration Office. U.S. Trademark Registration Office caused much confusion during a few weeks earlier this year as they sent out a trademark scam letter that was particularly troubling.

The USPTO was able to get U.S. Trademark Registration Office to comply with its demands and change its name and its mailings. However, it looks like the company was not punished in any way for their activities.

The USPTO should be commended for handling the situation quickly, efficiently, and – most important – effectively.

See below for the FOIA response from the USPTO and the correspondence between the USPTO and the U.S. Trademark Registration Office.

USPTO correpondence with U.S. Trademark Registration Office

Response to F-12-00215 Cover Letter