Blog

Posts Tagged ‘TTAB’

New TTAB Dashboard features more data and graphics

Posted by ipelton on: April 17th, 2013

A recent upgrade to the TTAB Dashboard is a great improvement. It features graphics that make interpreting the data and trends easier. It features more data from recent quarters and years with which to compare the current data.

For example, the chart below shows the trend in the number new filings at the TTAB.

image from TTAB dashboard  http://www.uspto.gov/dashboards/TTAB/main.dashxml

image from TTAB dashboard
http://www.uspto.gov/dashboards/TTAB/main.dashxml

This additional and improved data should be help practitioners advising clients in preparation for TTAB matters, and in weighing the risks and costs and timing as part of any strategy options. Perhaps it will also help lead to solutions to reduce the backlog at the TTAB and the average proceeding duration.

Kudos to the TTAB for listening to the comments at last year’s round table on processing times (transcript here) which included requests for a more robust dashboard!

 

Last month, I participated in a roundtable at the USPTO Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) on issues surrounding its accelerated case resolution (ACR) procedures.

My summary of the roundtable, written for the American Bar Association’s IP Law Section electronic newsletter, is online here.

Anatomy of initial disclosures at TTAB

Posted by ipelton on: June 29th, 2012

In a trademark opposition or cancellation at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), one of the elements of the first stages of the proceeding is “initial disclosures” from the parties. 

What are initial disclosures?They are sort of a road map for the discovery each party intends to take. The name potential witnesses and types of documents that could be relevant in the case. According to the TTAB rules: 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), a party is not obligated to disclose the name of every
witness, document or thing that may have or contain discoverable information about its claim or
defense, but merely the witnesses, documents and things having or containing discoverable
“information that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses.”

When are initial disclosures required? The timing of the disclosures is set in the Board’s scheduling order. They are after the discovery conference between the parties. And they must be served by a party prior to serving discovery. Note that a party may be obliged to supplement and update its initial disclosures if its scope of information, documents and witnesses changes. [See TTABlog®" Precedential No. 21: TTAB Excludes Opposer's Sole Trial Witness Due To Failure to Previously Identify Her.]

What do initial disclosures look like? Disclosures are not supposed to be filed with the Board, only served on the other parties. The address or telephone number of possible witnesses should be provided. The location of documents should be listed.

What if a party fails to make initial disclosures? The party may be subject to a motion to compel and, eventually, sanctions.

For more details about initial disclosures, see the TTAB Manual of Procedure (TBMP) Sect. 401.02.

I have provided a sample Initial Disclosures below [click images to enlarge].

Here are some relevant Board decisions posted over at TTABulator.com:

91196325

05/14/2012 TRIAL DATES RESET N Applicant moved to extend time to serve initial disclosures for a 2nd time after its first such motion was granted. Applicant showed good cause and motion granted, though Applicant cautioned regarding additional extensions.

91203404

05/17/2012 TRIAL DATES RESET N Applicant moved to extend time to serve initial disclosures. Applicant’s recent change of counsel found to constitute good cause and motion granted.

91203404

05/17/2012 TRIAL DATES RESET N Applicant moved to extend time to serve initial disclosures. Applicant’s recent change of counsel found to constitute good cause and motion granted.

TPAC Quarterly Meeting Summary (March 2012)

Posted by ipelton on: March 11th, 2012

The following is a summary of the key points discussed at the March 8, 2012, public meeting of the Trademark Public Advisory Committee (TPAC) at the USPTO.

The meeting covered many topics, including legislative and funding issue, performance measures, developments at the TTAB, and “Trademarks Next Generation.” The most newsworthy item was the announcement by Commissioner for Trademarks Deborah Cohn that a cease and desist letter has been sent by the Office of the Solicitor of the U.S.P.T.O. to the outfit calling itself “United States Trademark Registration Office.” This company has been sending confusing solicitations to trademark applicants and registrants that are of questionable value and are clearly intended to look like official government correspondence. More on these “trademark scams” below.

CFO’s update by Anthony Scardino:

  • The USPTO budget in FY2012 includes $18 million dollars for “Trademark Next Generation” computer items.
  • The FY2013 budget was recently submitted to Congress
  • The FY2013 budget includes funding for an additional 12 Examining Attorneys

Legislative Update by Dana Colarulli:

  • The USPTO’s Detroit office is on target for opening in July
  • The USPTO has received bids for opening two additional satellite locations – more than 60 locations have participated in the process and more than 500 comments have been received
  • Other legislative issues related to AIA and other patent issues

Commissioner Cohn’s update:

  • Performance measures through the end of January 2012 show that trademark operations is exceeding or within the desired range for nearly all targets [see documentation below for details].
  • 75% of all applications processed from start-to-finish entirely electronically.
  • Application filings are up approximately 7.5% over the same time last fiscal year.
  • 11 new Examiners were hired in September and are now ‘on production.’ 15 new examiners have been hired to start March 12, 0212, and another 10 will start in May 2012.
  • Trademark telecommuting workforce continues to expand – it now includes employees in 25 of the 48 continental United States.
  • The “tri-lateral” meeting has become the “TM5″ as it now includes China and Korea as full members. The group met in December 2011 and discussed a variety of issues, including a project to have each member use common status indicators for trademark records and an effort (led by OHIM) for harmonize identifications among the TM5.
  • Craig Morris is leading an effort to expand education and outreach by the USPTO to groups that are not in the trademark bar, and specifically to reach small businesses. A working group has been put together and has met and is working on ways to: engage the private sector to increase free or low cost trademark legal services; provide more CLE’s on trademark policing issues; and to reach out beyond the trademark bar.
  • USPTO held a roundtable on issues related to identification of goods and services on February 24, 2012. The goals for the USPTO are to re-design the structure of the ID manual, to possibly update the descriptions within the manual, and to increase collaboration with industry groups to understand their issues and topics better.
  • USPTO is co-hosting a series of roundtables with INTA. Two have already been held in NYC, upcoming ones include Alexandria, VA, Wilmington, DE, and Boston, MA.
  • The Official Gazette will no longer be printed on paper at some point in the near future (this year). There are only 150 print subscriptions worldwide.
  • 2012 Trademark Expo will be held October 19th and 20th.

Solicitations from trademark related vendors:

  • The volume has “blossomed” in recent months.
  • USPTO has placed new warning on the trademark landing page.
  • Commissioner Cohn announced that a cease and desist letter was sent last week by the Office of the Solicitor of the U.S.P.T.O. to the outfit calling itself “United States Trademark Registration Office.”
  • United States Trademark Registration Office has been sending trademark applicants and registrants solicitations that are deceptive.  Many have thought they are from the USPTO given the similarity in names and the letter’s official look and feel.
  • Commissioner Cohn noted that the letter invokes Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act.
  • The Commissioner also noted that if anyone – attorneys, applicants, etc. – have any information about United States Trademark Registration Office or have been mislead by their mailing, they are encouraged to file an on-line consumer complaint with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), at www.FTC.gov and/or contact the USPTO via TMFeedback@uspto.gov.

TTAB Update – Judge Rogers:

  • A new senior attorney, Cheryl Butler, was recently hired. Her duties include updates to the TBMP. An update to the TBMP is planned for sometime around May.
  • Cindy Greenbaum has been hired a the newest TTAB judge. She for the moment still in her former role managing the interlocutory attorneys until that role is be filled by a new hire, for which the process is underway.
  • TTAB is deploying a new “quality review” unit. The unit was formerly a pilot program and will now become permanent. One of its roles is to help to ensure accuracy in the history of proceedings in TTABvue, which is also helpful for having better and more consistent data for use in performance and other measures.
  • 20 precedents have been issued so far this (fiscal) year, up from the 38 issued the previous year.
  • The backlog of cases at the TTAB has increased lately [see data below]. The number of incoming filings has seen some numbers up and some down from quarter to quarter over the last few years. But given increases in application filings the last two years, it is likely that TTAB filing numbers will trend up more consistently in the future if the application filing increases continue.
  • A few more cases are under ACR than in the previous years.
  • TTAB may hold an ACR roundtable over the summer once the staffing issues are addressed and filled.
  • The number of cases operating under the old rules is down to 268, 58 of which are suspended for settlement.

CIO’s report – John B. Owens II & Raj Dolas

  • TEAS update a few months ago allowed for the submission of additional “non-primary” addresses. However, a glitch in the USPTO system meant that until recently many of the “non-primary” addresses were not receiving any updates. USPTO is now fixing this situation.
  • Many projects are underway for a variety of new and/or improved computer systems.
  • TSDR 2.0 will be coming soon and will include links to assignment and TTAB documents.
  • I asked about TSDR and the phase out of TARR. I noted that:
    • a static link would be very useful to practitioners so they could provide to clients and others to view their filings online.
    • more advance notice to outside users about the “sunsetting” or changing of systems would be very useful
  • The CIO noted that they were aware of the disruption caused by the planned TARR > TSDR changeover but that TSDR will replace it and will be a much better and more flexible system. TSDR does have capability for generating static links and they will likely make that information available.

Trademark Public Advisory Committee (TPAC) – March 9, 2012 documents

Introducing the “TTABulator” blog

Posted by ipelton on: November 18th, 2011

I recently launched a new blog called TTABulator™. TTABulator (http://ttabulator.wordpress.com) will be a space for posting data, case summaries and analysis related to the USPTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

It will begin by publishing weekly (approximately) listings of the newest TTAB cancellation and opposition filings. Those interested in seeing who recently opposed marks and which marks have recently been opposed will find this data useful and interesting.

In the future, I hope to be adding more commentaries, summaries and analysis of TTAB cases and procedures. If you have any ideas, please leave a comment or send me an email.