Posts Tagged ‘USPTO’
Here are the recent USPTO filing statistics through September 30, 2016, the end of FY2016:
New trademark application filings at the USPTO:
- 3rd Quarter of 2016: 94,627 new applications filed
- First three quarters of 2016: 292,923 applications filed
- FY2016 (October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016): 384,518 applications filed
Filings for FY2016 were therefore up more than 6 percent over the prior FY2015. This is a large increase, although not as large as last year’s increase.
- FY2015: 362,576 applications filed
- FY2014: 330,760 applications filed
- 3rd Quarter of 2015: 91,441 new applications filed
- 3rd Quarter of 2014: 83,001 new applications filed
- 3rd quarter of 2013: 82,473 applications filed
Note: All data retrieved via TESS search on USPTO.gov on October 6, 2016.
The 2016 National Trademark Expo will be October 21st and 22nd at the Andrew W. Mellon Auditorium on the National Mall in Washington, DC.
The guest speaker at the opening ceremony will be Under Armour’s President of Management & Innovation.
The two day event will feature more than 20 exhibitors, educational presentations, outdoor attractions, costumed characters, children’s activities, and more. For full details, see the USPTO’s webpage: About the USPTO’s National Trademark Expo.
Our firm is proud to have three client’s exhibiting this year!
- ® (City of Falls Church (Virginia) Economic Development Authority)
- MUSICAL PAIRING®
See you at the Expo!
The USPTO asked users to submit comments regarding proposed changes to the formatting of online declarations that are part of trademark application and renewal filings.
We submitted the following comments:
[Note that you can submit comments, comment on other submissions, or “upvote” them to indicate support]
It appears that the USPTO wishes to increase the “solemnity” of the trademark application declarations in response to the Section 8 & 71 pilot project that revealed more than half of all renewals included at least partially overbroad statements of continued use. Considering that these declarations are already made under penalty of perjury, I am not sure how big an impact the increasing solemnity might have on the problem.
Even so, it seems that the PTO believes the issue is not the seriousness of the language itself, but instead that signatories may not be carefully reading and appreciating the significance of the attestations they are making. I wholeheartedly agree. The best solution, however, is not merely to restructure the paragraphs of the declaration, but to restructure the way that all text is presented throughout the TEAS forms. The declaration is just one of myriad blocks of text and warnings appearing throughout the form. The solemnity of the declaration, especially to inexperienced users, is obscured not because it is a large block of text, but because it is one of many paragraphs of legalese spread throughout the TEAS forms.
Users filling out a form within TEAS are confronted with numerous long blocks of text and various warnings, many of which are presented in garish, hard-to-read red fonts. Many of these blocks of text appear even when they are not relevant to the particular needs or choices of the user. While experienced TEAS users know what to look for, a novice user must painstakingly filter through each block of text to determine which are relevant. Nothing distinguishes those that are important from those that are not. As a result, the declarations can easily get lost in the shuffle.
If the PTO wants to ensure the solemnity of the declarations, they should start by changing the way text in general is presented throughout the forms. Distinguishing the declarations from the rest of the form would substantially increase the weight and attention users give them.
As the PTO begins the process of updating all TEAS forms, I hope it is mindful of this presentation issue. Streamlining the forms will make them more understandable and user friendly. Although the PTO must be thorough in providing information on TEAS forms for the sake of novice users, there are ways to prevent the sheer volume to information from becoming unintelligible walls of text. Perhaps the PTO might even consider multiple versions of the TEAS forms for users with differing degrees of experience.
– Erik M Pelton & John C Heinbockel on behalf of Erik M. Pelton & Associates, PLLC
For all of the comments, including those submitted by other practitioners, see: http://uspto-tmep.ideascale.com/
The USPTO recently asked for public comments regarding proposed changes to renewal filings, namely a program whereby 10% of submissions may be required to submit additional evidence of use beyond the current requirement of one specimen per International Class of goods and/or services.
Our firm submitting the following comments:
Others, including major IP associations, submitted comments as well. Many of the comments supported the program, many expressed concerns about how it will be implemented.
The full text of all the comments submitted to the USPTO can be found here: